From owner-freebsd-bugs Wed Jan 5 15:40:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DCA6154B6 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 15:40:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id PAA77471; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 15:40:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 15:40:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200001052340.PAA77471@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Christian Weisgerber Subject: Re: bin/15906: rcmd(3) prototype disagrees with definition Reply-To: Christian Weisgerber Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/15906; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Christian Weisgerber To: Garrett Wollman Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/15906: rcmd(3) prototype disagrees with definition Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 00:35:40 +0100 Garrett Wollman: > >> Synopsis: rcmd(3) prototype disagrees with definition > > No, it does not. Indeed. Please close the PR. Sorry for wasting everybody's time. I should have noticed that this is all throughout the tree. > Please read a text on Standard C, such as K&R or H&S. Sigh. I found it, section A7.3.2 in K&Rv2. Integral promotion of integral type arguments and parameters for old style function declarations. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message