From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Aug 14 08:17:21 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA04712 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 08:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA04705 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 08:17:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id IAA00252 for ; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 08:17:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA27096; Wed, 14 Aug 1996 09:13:18 -0600 (MDT) Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 09:13:18 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199608141513.JAA27096@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams To: "Ugen J.S.Antsilevich" Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: RE: ipfw vs ipfilter In-Reply-To: References: Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Heh:) > > Well..intresting enough it always works this way - first ppl take it, > then they screw it and then they say it's bad and take something else. None of that from you young man. I *specifically* hounded you in D.C. to pickup your code and do it better, and you turned me down saying that work was too boring and slow for you to feel like hacking anymore. Complaining that folks 'wrecked' your code when you weren't willing to fix known bugs in it is bad codesmanship. However, if you were willing to 'fix' the outstanding bugs in it all would be forgiven. :) Nate