From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 14 21:04:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E174A10656A8 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:04:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718A08FC26 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:04:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21685 invoked by uid 399); 14 Dec 2009 21:04:25 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 14 Dec 2009 21:04:25 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4B26A861.2080805@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:04:33 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philip M. Gollucci" References: <200912100507.nBA577Q3033700@repoman.freebsd.org> <4B2330FB.70309@FreeBSD.org> <4B243FBC.8080507@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <4B243FBC.8080507@p6m7g8.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Glen Barber , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/p5-qpsmtpd/files qpsmtpd.in X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:04:27 -0000 Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: >> I was going to install this port and try to come up with something a >> little more constructive but it gave an odd dependency error so I >> wasn't able to do so: >> >> ERROR: the required Digest::SHA1 module is installed, >> but is not an up-to-date version. at >> lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util/DependencyInfo.pm line 294. > you sir are correct. I've been away from ports since Septemberish and > am just getting back into it. I need to update it 0.83 anyway. > > I was going to rewrite the whole rc.d script from sratch at that time. > In the meantime though this particular thing should help that person > until I have time. No worries, I have no expectation that people can (or should) instantly respond to my rc.d niggling. :) I was serious about the offer of help though. BTW, in thinking about this some more I think that the command_interpreter issue is probably the key in rewriting the script. Without that I can see why someone might have found it necessary to duplicate so much rc.subr functionality. hth, Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/