From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 7 12:45:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A16516A41F; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:45:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D200543D46; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 12:45:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j87CiCp0042493; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:44:12 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j87CiBti042492; Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:44:11 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar) Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:44:11 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy To: obrien@freebsd.org, Dmitry Pryanishnikov , Poul-Henning Kamp , bug-followup@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050907124411.GB38943@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <35184.1125657474@phk.freebsd.dk> <20050905134006.B73214@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20050907103416.GB91876@dragon.NUXI.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050907103416.GB91876@dragon.NUXI.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Subject: Re: kern/85503: panic: wrong dirclust using msdosfs in RELENG_6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 12:45:08 -0000 On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:34:16AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 01:50:01PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > > ftp://external.atlantis.dp.ua/FreeBSD/PR/85503/msdosfs.patch > > > > problem has gone away. Please, if possible, review and commit it. I think > > this > > patch is a good MFC candidate for RELENG_6 and RELENG_6_0, since it > > prevents panic in quite common environment. > > I've committed it to HEAD. It is up to the RE's to get it into RELENG_6. David, I'm afraid there is certain misunderstanding here. First, the RE team will hardly take care of getting the fix to RELENG_6 without your initiative. Second, the PR kern/85503 shouldn't be closed until the problem is fixed in all relevant branches: It should be put in the "patched" state instead according to the project's well-established policy. Thanks. -- Yar