From owner-freebsd-current  Thu May  7 05:37:12 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA07227
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 7 May 1998 05:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA07208;
          Thu, 7 May 1998 05:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from julian@whistle.com)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA20692;
	Thu, 7 May 1998 05:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22)
 via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd020690; Thu May  7 12:33:20 1998
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 05:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
To: current@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: SLICE broken
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980507031838.28597A-100000@current1.whistle.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980507052845.28826A-100000@current1.whistle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

To reply to my own mail..

I've (I think) made this work (I'm typing on such a kernel)
at least in the common case.
If you are really worried about system integrety (then what are you doing
on -current :-) then it might be an idea to not use SLICE/DEVFS for a few
days till I manage to go through all the code paths again just to be sure.

I think I've just added "fix SCSI code" back onto my list, at least 
till we see CAM more completely deployed.

julian

On Thu, 7 May 1998, Julian Elischer wrote:

> 
> Because I origially wrote the scsi code I was under the mistaken
> impression that I knew what was going on there and today's checkins
> of sd.c have screwed up if SLICE/DEVFS is defined.
> 
> backing down to 1.127 should make it work as well as before.
> 1.128 is definitly bogus. I'm working on it but 
> some things happenned in the scsi code during my absence that are
> definately done absolutly backwards. (right idea but backwards.)
> for example one cannot get rid of all the devsw entrypoints
> even of one doesn't need them any more :-]
> 
> julian
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message