From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 15 05:17:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963AB16A41F for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 05:17:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D596F43D49 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 05:17:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 16700 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2005 05:17:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=KW+X4tZBKAf27gAbiNFWrZQmZQuHNLjUpwkIXoO0ylJwlM5Y/vpjx07DmD79SMYSrklEcNSAv+eRv3xGiTEIWs7oK4JevIZHmBl/rNu7BxVjzlN2lSY9/6fHXG0qoD2HKMF6mVpUjCBSwPzIYsO+i8V6zUoBDDIXAm9z5xOcbTM= ; Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.0.199?) (mikej@rogers.com@66.96.18.43 with plain) by smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Dec 2005 05:17:22 -0000 Message-ID: <43A0FC61.3060704@rogers.com> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:17:21 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Kirkwood References: <20051215002618.B4D3B5D07@ptavv.es.net> <43A0E607.2030101@alumni.rice.edu> <43A0E916.7070204@samsco.org> <43A0EC9F.9080800@paradise.net.nz> In-Reply-To: <43A0EC9F.9080800@paradise.net.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel cpu entries X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 05:17:23 -0000 Mark Kirkwood wrote: > Is a minor update to the handbook needed in order avoid confusion > then? e.g. I have been commenting out CPU_I586 on all my PIII systems > in the (mistaken it would seem) belief that having CPU_I686 only was > better. Agreed, i have always just used I686, assuming it inherited the features of I586. I think most people will assume this.