From owner-freebsd-advocacy Tue Jun 12 11:36: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4181937B407 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:36:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA26583 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:35:58 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010612123523.04476a30@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:35:34 -0600 To: advocacy@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Subject: Evan Leibovitch on BSD Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The article at http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/comment/0,5859,2772296,00.html subtly suggests that there must be something wrong with BSD's philosophy or licensing because GPLed software (in particular, Linux, KDE, etc.) is the focus of more and more prominent startups. (Needless to say, as someone who has a strong vested interest in Linux, he's not exactly unbiased.) It's probably worth setting him straight in in the TalkBack. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message