From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 19 10:54:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925E237B4EC for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:54:17 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA29316; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 19:54:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Robin Cutshaw Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Build timings - FreeBSD 4.2 vs. Linux References: <20010219134043.A8347@intercore.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 19 Feb 2001 19:54:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: Robin Cutshaw's message of "Mon, 19 Feb 2001 13:40:43 -0500" Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Robin Cutshaw writes: > Any ideas as to why it would take almost three times longer to build > on FreeBSD? Yup: 4.x sucks at SMP. Try the comparison again with uniprocessor kernels - I expect you'll see a much smaller difference. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message