From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Dec  2 21:27:56 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA09523
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 21:27:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell.wco.com (root@shell.wco.com [199.4.94.16])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA09518
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 21:27:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zellion.cyberwind.com (zellion.cyberwind.com [199.4.109.223]) by shell.wco.com (8.8.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id VAA09941; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 21:20:12 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199612030520.VAA09941@shell.wco.com>
From: "Jeffery T. White" <zellion@cyberwind.com>
To: "Joe Greco" <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com>,
        "Julian Assange" <proff@suburbia.net>
Cc: <hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: TCP/IP bandwidth bragging
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 21:22:25 -0800
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

There was an FAQ that dealt with this sort of [Linux Vs FreeBSD] question,
the final answer looked something like this:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Is SO!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Is NOT!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Is SO!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Is NOT!
>>>>>>>>>>>>Is SO!
>>>>>>>>>>>Is NOT!
>>>>>>>>>>Is SO!
>>>>>>>>>Is NOT!
>>>>>>>>Is SO!
>>>>>>>Is NOT!
>>>>>>Is SO!
>>>>>Is NOT!
>>>>Is SO!
>>>Is NOT!
>>Is SO!
>Is NOT!
So the only two questions remain:
1. Who is the "Is SO" who is the "Is NOT"?
2. Did the "Is SO" or "Is NOT" folks win?

:-)

| Jeffery T. White
| email: zellion@cyberwind.com
|
| Cyberwind,  The wind knows...
| http://www.cyberwind.com