Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 9 Aug 2013 14:11:57 +0000
From:      "Teske, Devin" <Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com>
To:        "<freebsd@lidstrom.eu>" <freebsd@lidstrom.eu>
Cc:        Devin Teske <dteske@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   [SOLVED] Re: missing /boot/menusets.4th
Message-ID:  <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720200D19F@ltcfiswmsgmb21>
In-Reply-To: <5204BC75.9090705@lidstrom.eu>
References:  <E1V7i3Q-0009aG-NU@kabab.cs.huji.ac.il> <5204BC75.9090705@lidstrom.eu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Aug 9, 2013, at 2:55 AM, Henrik Lidstr=F6m wrote:

> On 08/09/13 10:28, Daniel Braniss wrote:
>> as of now (sorry have no rev#) the file
>> 	sys/boot/forth/menusets.4th
>> is not being installed, so boot failes!
>>=20
>> danny
>>=20
>>=20
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>=20
> Yep, I just recovered from it using fixit and copying the file from src t=
o /boot.
>=20
> FreeBSD 149999HELI 9.2-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.2-BETA2 #7: Fri Aug  9 10:43:22 CE=
ST 2013     root@149999HELI:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/JOBBD2 amd64
>=20

(raises hand)

My fault!

I committed SVN r254109/r254113.

... and forgot to merge r242688.

And I know why I missed it...

Learned a valuable lessen today...

*** I did my "mergeinfo --show-revs=3Deligible" in sys/boot/forth ***

NOTE: Despite the fact that I did "svn merge" in the proper location, the "=
show-revs" was influenced by the fact that I was in a sub-directory ... thu=
s I never caught r242688 because at that sub-directory level, the revision =
didn't apply (show-revs=3Deligible didn't list it; and that's the list I wa=
s processing).

It's not that I wasn't paying close attention to...

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/subver=
sion-primer.html

It's that I didn't know that the rule of getting the list of eligible revs =
was quite as important as the actual act of merging. I'm very aware now tha=
t when you go to synchronize branches... it's imperative that even the show=
-revs step be done at the right level (but to be fair... I wasn't expecting=
 something like r242688 ... and it had been a _long_ time since I had last =
broke the build [albeit with the same problem in HEAD]).

Much apologies.

Merging r242688 immediately to stable/9 to fix the missing file issue.
--=20
Devin

_____________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia=
l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an=
d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma=
nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware=
 that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie=
w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D720200D19F>