Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 22:38:16 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely12.cicely.de> To: Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de> Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bad performance on alpha? (make buildworld) Message-ID: <20040224213815.GB44313@cicely12.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20040224215457.34d3decd.lehmann@ans-netz.de> References: <20040223192103.59ad7b69.lehmann@ans-netz.de> <20040223191652.GB5837@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20040223205152.GC44313@cicely12.cicely.de> <20040224215457.34d3decd.lehmann@ans-netz.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:54:57PM +0100, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > Bernd Walter wrote: > > > I think thats around factor 2-4 slower. > > Especially without having CPUTYPE >=ev56 set. > > Ok, I have CPUTYPE=ev56 now set in make.conf and I got slightly better > results: > > make buildworld 19144.53 real 16475.63 user 1964.88 sys > make -j2 buildworld 19530.91 real 16784.12 user 2143.32 sys > make -j3 buildworld 19639.32 real 16948.23 user 2173.32 sys > make -j4 buildworld 19892.68 real 17177.20 user 2202.12 sys > > I installed the last buildworld and built a new kernel... let's see how > those new (with CPUTYPE=56 compiled) binaries are performing... > *reruning-tests* The binaries are only used to build the toolchain. The remaining part of the buildworld aren't using the system binaries. -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de ticso@bwct.de info@bwct.de
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040224213815.GB44313>