From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 30 05:48:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-STABLE@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDD316A417 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:48:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D53F13C491 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:48:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 22815 invoked by uid 399); 30 Oct 2007 05:47:58 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO slave.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2007 05:47:58 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:47:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Scott Lambert In-Reply-To: <20071029201853.GB81439@sysmon.tcworks.net> Message-ID: References: <20071029201853.GB81439@sysmon.tcworks.net> X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0xD5B2F0FB Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is anyone seeing BIND 9.3.4-P1 use all CPU time on 6.2-STABLE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:48:14 -0000 On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Scott Lambert wrote: > I have a 6.2-STABLE snapshot box from August that where named(8) is > going into what appears to be a tight loop calling gettimeofday(). It > is using all CPU time on the box. It seems to be answering queries > alright, just using a lot of CPU. I think your best bet would probably be to try BIND 9.4 and see if it does the same thing. 9.3.x is still going to get some bugfixes, but more attention has been paid to the 9.4.x branch. If you're building bind94 on RELENG_6 make sure to unselect the threads option. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection