From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jul 18 11:48:38 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA08617
          for stable-outgoing; Thu, 18 Jul 1996 11:48:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA08611
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 1996 11:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by misery.sdf.com (8.7.5/UNS-1.0) with SMTP id MAA10728; Thu, 18 Jul 1996 12:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 12:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: cmu-snmp
In-Reply-To: <10199.837710572@time.cdrom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.94.960718115424.10581B-100000@misery.sdf.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


  Should cmu-snmp have been included in the xperimnt directory?

  I understand that cmu-snmp is no longer being developed.  The particular
version included in 2.1.5-RELEASE appears to be exact same one included in
2.1?

  However, 2.1.5-R has a perfectly good snmp package in the ports
collection (ucd-snmp) that works quite well, while cmu-snmp barely works.

Tom