From owner-freebsd-chat  Mon Jul 28 06:10:12 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA05048
          for chat-outgoing; Mon, 28 Jul 1997 06:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper.itribe.net (gatekeeper.itribe.net [209.49.144.254])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA05024;
          Mon, 28 Jul 1997 06:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199707281308.JAA08227@gatekeeper.itribe.net>
Received: forwarded by SMTP 1.5.2.
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 09:11:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jamie Bowden <jamie@itribe.net>
To: ML Duke <mlduke@resumes-by-duke.com>
cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>,
        "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@freebsd.org>,
        Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>, chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FTC regulating use of registrations
In-Reply-To: <33D97B7E.D1648961@resumes-by-duke.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Oh fuck.  Why don't you get a damn clue.  He's being overly facetious,
mostly at this point to get you to frenzy.  

YHBT, YHL, HAND.

(Translation for the utterly clueless:  You Have Been Trolled, You Have
Lost, Have A Nice Day.)

On Fri, 25 Jul 1997, ML Duke wrote:

> Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> 
> > > Jordan: When you advocate compulsory measures, you are a display of
> > > the common belief that others should be forced to do what you want
> > > at the point of a gun.
> >
> > Yeah?  What's your point? :)
> >
> >                                         Jordan
> 
> I found your response difficult to believe, which is to say it
> challenged my imagination to actuallypicture someone in my mind who
> could say it. The point should be self-evident, but I'll try.
> 
> What is it that you like to do, want to do or enjoy doing that, were one
> special interest group or another were to manage to have a law passed
> against it, (the point of the gun) that it would cause you distress?
> 
> It is compulsory that we do not kill another human being, that we do not
> violate anothers natural property
> rights nor interfere in anothers activities as long as that person is
> not harming another (and acts of  mutual consent  do not apply here).
> 
> The above are in keeping with the natural goodness of our natures, not
> to say that many do not violate
> their own natures on a regular basis. Those would would pass into law
> compulsory measures, for
> example.
> 
> ML Duke
> 
> 

Jamie Bowden

System Administrator, iTRiBE.net