Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 16:10:28 -0600 From: "Ken Wills" <kenwills_lists@yahoo.com> To: "Bob Udderwein" <budd@netcom.com>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Linux vs. FreeBSD Message-ID: <00dd01bf4b37$19273e70$5a4f89d0@tds.net> References: <199912202156.NAA04539@netcom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: "Bob Udderwein" <budd@netcom.com> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Sent: Monday, December 20, 1999 3:56 PM Subject: Linux vs. FreeBSD I'll bite on a few of these. There really isn't a 'correct' operating systerm - I would think the BSD license would be a major advantage in the embedded world. > FreeBSD run on any hardware besides x86? Alpha and x86 (http://www.freebsd.org) > Do we have to share with the world the source Nope. Many choose to, but the license says you can lock away the source if you want. The GNU license is very different, though - you'll have to make source available, if you distribute modified sources/binaries. With regard to the versions of Kerberos and Bind, I would suggest you either (a) install a machine and check, or (b) look at cvsweb on http://www.freebsd.org __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place. Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00dd01bf4b37$19273e70$5a4f89d0>