From owner-cvs-all Tue Jan 18 15:37: 0 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from m0.cs.berkeley.edu (m0.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.176]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D94A150B8; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:36:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca7-245.ix.netcom.com [209.109.235.245]) by m0.cs.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA40538; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:36:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id PAA98533; Tue, 18 Jan 2000 15:36:20 -0800 (PST) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Brian Fundakowski Feldman , Munechika SUMIKAWA , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/openssh Makefile ports/security/openssh/patches patch-ad References: <99185.948223720@zippy.cdrom.com> From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 18 Jan 2000 15:36:19 -0800 In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard"'s message of "Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:28:40 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 17 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk * From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" * Before you make suggestions about how to solve this, let's discuss the * "multiple maintainer problem" in more detail. We don't need a kludge * to this one, we need a real mechanism which allows for this so we don't * end up back in this discussion again. What we have is an unknown number of scripts out there that assume MAINTAINER is a single e-mail address, since that has been the rule for many years. I don't wish to break those scripts nor try to find out how many will break, I think it is perfectly fine to have only one maintainer (address) per port, after all it's called MAINTAINER and not MAINTAINERS. Can we return to our regularly scheduled release engineering now? :) -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message