Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 13:09:57 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@regency.nsu.ru> To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@freebsd.org> Cc: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@freebsd.org>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/tunefs tunefs.8 Message-ID: <20020507130957.C1989@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020507115943.O75198@wantadilla.lemis.com>; from grog@freebsd.org on Tue, May 07, 2002 at 11:59:43AM %2B0930 References: <200205061753.g46Hrpm90419@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020507115943.O75198@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 11:59:43AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Monday, 6 May 2002 at 10:53:51 -0700, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > trhodes 2002/05/06 10:53:50 PDT > > > > Modified files: > > sbin/tunefs tunefs.8 > > Log: > > 'file system' > filesystem > > Why? I prefer "file system", and so do spell checkers. Usually one refers to "how data is organized on disk" as "filesystem", like in "UFS, or ext2 filesystem" for instance. "File" and "system" are also distinct words. ispell, which I use to spell-check my outgoing mail, accepts "filesystem" just fine. I wonder what original [ancient] UNIX specs did say... ./danfe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020507130957.C1989>