From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 13 18:56:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF1D4D78 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53405697 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:56:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tom.home (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sADIuQvM024096 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:56:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 kib.kiev.ua sADIuQvM024096 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id sADIuQ8V024095; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:56:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:56:26 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Eric van Gyzen Subject: Re: [patch] Wrong assertion in kern_umtx.c Message-ID: <20141113185626.GB17068@kib.kiev.ua> References: <5464ECDC.1080002@vangyzen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5464ECDC.1080002@vangyzen.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on tom.home Cc: FreeBSD current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:56:34 -0000 On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:39:40PM -0500, Eric van Gyzen wrote: > There is a [practically] tautological assertion in kern_umtx.c. I have > not even compile-tested the following patch. I'll test it when I have > time. I'd be grateful if someone beats me to it. > > Eric > > > diff --git a/sys/kern/kern_umtx.c b/sys/kern/kern_umtx.c > index 33fdf71..c6b42c0 100644 > --- a/sys/kern/kern_umtx.c > +++ b/sys/kern/kern_umtx.c > @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ struct umtxq_chain { > }; > > #define UMTXQ_LOCKED_ASSERT(uc) > mtx_assert(&(uc)->uc_lock, MA_OWNED) > -#define UMTXQ_BUSY_ASSERT(uc) KASSERT(&(uc)->uc_busy, ("umtx > chain is not busy")) > +#define UMTXQ_BUSY_ASSERT(uc) KASSERT((uc)->uc_busy, ("umtx > chain is not busy")) > > /* > * Don't propagate time-sharing priority, there is a security reason, > Yes, I tested it, thanks for the submission. I committed r274478, and I decided to remove macro used in single place, at all. There is one more place, which I added several weeks ago, but I really do not see much point in using the macro, it obfuscates the code.