From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri May 29 17:21:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA08151 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Fri, 29 May 1998 17:21:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from couatl.uchicago.edu (couatl.uchicago.edu [128.135.21.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA08139 for ; Fri, 29 May 1998 17:21:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sfarrell@couatl.uchicago.edu) Received: (from sfarrell@localhost) by couatl.uchicago.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) id TAA17859; Fri, 29 May 1998 19:20:47 -0500 (CDT) To: Mike Smith Cc: Ollivier Robert , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Star Office Installation References: <199805281908.MAA00998@dingo.cdrom.com> From: sfarrell+lists@farrell.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: 29 May 1998 19:20:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: Mike Smith's message of "Thu, 28 May 1998 12:08:10 -0700" Message-ID: <87lnrkd2xs.fsf@couatl.uchicago.edu> Lines: 17 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.9/XEmacs 20.4 - "Emerald" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mike Smith writes: > > According to Daniel O'Connor: > > > Has anyone got this to install, or do I have to hack procfs myself? > > > > I'm really surprised. I installed SO4 a few months ago (when 4.0 release > > came out) and it didn't puke like this. > > They've updated it. I don't have any confirmation, but I suspect that > it may now be a glibc rather that libc5 build. What are the issues involved in getting freebsd to run glibc binaries? -- Steve Farrell To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message