From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 25 10:00:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A568116A4CF for ; Tue, 25 May 2004 10:00:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7276F43D4C for ; Tue, 25 May 2004 10:00:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from [66.127.85.91] ([66.127.85.91]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i4PH00WR095538 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 25 May 2004 10:00:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) From: Sam Leffler Organization: Errno Consulting To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 09:56:59 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <1144707194.20040524195834@sendmail.ru> <20040525003535.GB91089@jade.elsasser.org> <1085464712.319.18.camel@klotz.local> In-Reply-To: <1085464712.319.18.camel@klotz.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200405250956.59927.sam@errno.com> cc: Toxa cc: Martin Subject: Re: wi(4) and shared authmode X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 17:00:16 -0000 On Monday 24 May 2004 10:58 pm, Martin wrote: > Am Tue, den 25.05.2004 schrieb Josh Elsasser um 2:35: > > You could always use IPSEC. It's a bit more work to get up and > > running, but you can rest easy knowing you have actual security. > > Yes, but many people don't even want that someone can connect > to their AP. They try to setup authmode or at least WEP. > I've turned on WEP and IPsec here, because of samba. > It broadcasts itself and it's not getting tunneled this way. > Has anyone a solution to this? (I mean: getting the > broadcast encrypted, not splitting the networks) WPA/802.11i encrypts all non-PAE traffic. It's also easy to add an option to discard all unencrypted traffic. This is necessary for supporting WPA anyway (except for PAE traffic used for the initial key exchange msgs). Sam