From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Jan 8 8:55:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.shorewood-epc.co.uk (mail.shorewood-epc.co.uk [195.10.240.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5633037B41A for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 08:55:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from root@localhost) by mail.shorewood-epc.co.uk (8.11.3/8.11.1) id g08GsxJ09713; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:54:59 GMT (envelope-from freebsd-net@epcdirect.co.uk) Delivered-To: nils@tisys.org Received: from lfarr (bka.shorewood-epc.co.uk [192.168.15.200]) by mail.shorewood-epc.co.uk (8.11.3/8.11.1av) with ESMTP id g08Gswg09705; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:54:58 GMT (envelope-from freebsd-net@epcdirect.co.uk) From: "Lawrence Farr" To: Cc: "'Nils Holland'" Subject: RE: 4.5-PRERELEASE: VIA chases again... Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:54:51 -0000 Message-ID: <002401c19865$30bb61b0$c80fa8c0@lfarr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3311 In-Reply-To: <20020108175106.A1838@tisys.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I also managed to get it more stable by using ATA_TAGS=1. Loads slower, but stable strangely. Hmmmm. Lawrence Farr EPC Direct Limited > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG] On Behalf Of 'Nils Holland' > Sent: 08 January 2002 16:51 > To: Lawrence Farr > Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: 4.5-PRERELEASE: VIA chases again... > > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:06:40PM -0000, Lawrence Farr stood > up and spoke: > > Have you got the UFS_DIRHASH code on? I'm trying without > that currently. > > Yes, I currently have that on but may try without it later. RIght now, > however, it seems as if softupdates has something to do with > my crashes. My > restore operation did indeed work without softupdates, while with > softupdates it almost instantly crashed. I will do some more > investigations > on the softupdates vs. no softupdates issue and see what I > can find out. > The strange thing, however, is that my other machines don't > seem to care if > softupdates is on or not, they seem to work right either way. > > Greetings > Nils > > > -- > Nils Holland > Ti Systems - FreeBSD in Tiddische, Germany > http://www.tisys.org * nils@tisys.org > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message