From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 20:51:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CC616A4E1 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A61E43D49 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:51:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 6722 invoked by uid 399); 23 Aug 2006 20:51:56 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Aug 2006 20:51:56 -0000 Message-ID: <44ECBFE8.7000809@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:51:52 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060729) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Ermilov References: <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> <44EB6411.4040406@paladin.bulgarpress.com> <20060823193309.GA77890@rambler-co.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060823193309.GA77890@rambler-co.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Vivek Khera , "Todorov @ Paladin" , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:51:59 -0000 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:07:45PM +0300, Todorov @ Paladin wrote: >> Also - why portupgrade is not always aware of >> previously chosen options for a port build? >> > It depends. If options are OPTIONS (in the ports sense), they > are saved and independent of portupgrade. If options are > makefile options specified in pkgtools.conf, they are only > taken into accont if the port is (re)build explicitly; they > are not taken into account if a port is (re)built as a > dependency of another port. In plain text: if port B has > options in pkgtools.conf, and port A has B as its dependency, > and you portinstall/portupgrade A, B will be built (if needs > be) without pkgtools.conf options. Be careful. sysutils/portconf does not have that limitation. If you specify flags using that method, they will always be used. FYI, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection