From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 4 18:33:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5EF106564A; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 18:33:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCAC8FC17; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 18:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn14 with SMTP id hn14so5338666wib.13 for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:33:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0Z/R27c4kZgSeUhpoVH++OFVX7pw+ggmRtBB4xjse2I=; b=q8PinatOiiS0wgWwnLIqjzwryaeb4Mu9ck0Hm2dhe5wHpS0P1Ued/T8fgKMu5oN3GQ C7MKkLs5AsGkzRoKuXh6hHcwKP/s48v7hBJYRbC/w3Io7hovIC3IsK+x4XZk764km6yi Kom2/JUn/DK2fhcopl/LLOVKJfVd6g0XcbfBY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.7.231 with SMTP id m7mr5339846wia.3.1328380413753; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:33:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.75.137 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 10:33:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F2CF91B.8050604@gmail.com> References: <1076713525.20120129133839@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4F2541A3.8020401@sentex.net> <1146850915.20120129204328@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4F2CF91B.8050604@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 10:33:33 -0800 Message-ID: From: Jack Vogel To: Hooman Fazaeli Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, lev@freebsd.org, Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: em0 hangs on 8-STABLE again X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:33:35 -0000 Am not positive, why don't you test it and see? Was there a change that had been proposed to fix this? Thanks, Jack On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 1:23 AM, Hooman Fazaeli wro= te: > Dear Jack > > Is the problem related to link loss fixed in this version? > The problem was that if if_snd fills up during a "link_active =3D=3D 0" > period, stack never calls em_start again, because em does not > kick off tx when link becomes active again. > > > > On 1/29/2012 9:51 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: > >> No, I told Mike I'd get it into 8.x, have just been busy, but will try >> and get it pushed up in the queue. >> >> Jack >> >> >> 2012/1/29 Lev Serebryakov >> >> Hello, Mike. >>> You wrote 29 =D1=8F=D0=BD=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=80=D1=8F 2012 =D0=B3., 16:54:5= 9: >>> >>> My home server lost connection on em0 this night again. It was >>>>> persistent problem some times ago, but with version 7.2.3 it is first >>>>> time, but with worse symptoms. >>>>> >>>> 7.3.0 from HEAD is quite stable for me. Hopefully it will be MFC'd so= on >>>> >>> :) >>> I'm afraid, that "MFC'd" means "to 9-STABLE" now :( >>> >>> >>> -- >>> // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@**freebsd.org= >>> " >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@**freebsd.org<= freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org> >> " >> >>