Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 12:00:50 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Ian Lepore <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org> Cc: attilio@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFQ] make witness panic an option Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=S3a1pyLHOe%2BSayVNDe=mAogQnkNpnSTakpOm56EdOUQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1353009310.1217.172.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <CAJ-Vmo=i=Amo_QqHi4GnGie0Gc0YnK3XaRKjvBO-=SFboFYPmA@mail.gmail.com> <1353001175.1217.153.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <CAJ-FndBP5Pi=SCpyBLK3b=HM_gQ9u8M4%2B1tLk9tA5X-gqismVA@mail.gmail.com> <1353009310.1217.172.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15 November 2012 11:55, Ian Lepore <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org> wrote: > Since you've made it abundantly clear in this thread that you are not > open to anyone else's opinion and won't change your mind, I'm not going > to waste even 10 seconds explaining my perfectly valid needs. > > I'll just keep hacking the code up to not panic when I need to. I agree with Attilio - any driver or subsystem that's causing witness panics need to be fixed. But I think my change is invaluable for development, where you want to improve and debug the locking and lock interactions of a subsystem. adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=S3a1pyLHOe%2BSayVNDe=mAogQnkNpnSTakpOm56EdOUQ>