From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 31 12:21:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A401E106566B for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:21:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cm@therek.net) Received: from lux.therek.net (lux.therek.net [64.85.172.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1238FC12 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:21:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cm@therek.net) Received: from [10.3.81.80] (gate01.polsat.net.pl [193.164.142.33]) (authenticated bits=0) by lux.therek.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6VCLd62006362 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:21:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A72E1CC.3040302@therek.net> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:21:32 +0200 From: Cezary Morga User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> References: <1248027417.14210.110.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> <200907232335.54973.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <4A6FF5FA.5010904@FreeBSD.org> <200907282342.25038.mel.flynn+fbsd.current@mailing.thruhere.net> <4A707534.8000808@FreeBSD.org> <20090729170601.GA2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> <4A709981.80600@FreeBSD.org> <20090729200013.GB2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> <4A70ACD2.6030804@FreeBSD.org> <20090729203552.GC2841@tafi.alm.flutnet.org> <4A728725.70003@therek.net> <4A72D251.4070506@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <4A72D251.4070506@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster -R (Was: Re: HEADS-UP: Shared Library Versions bumped...) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 12:21:42 -0000 Miroslav Lachman pisze: >> If I may chip in here on a similar note. >> I'm currently looking for a port management tool that might replace good >> ol' portinstall/portupgrade tools in my toolbox. Portmaster looks >> promising but I noticed that it doesn't seem to take BATCH=yes in my >> /etc/make.conf into consideration. So, is it me or there's something >> more I have to do? > > I think BATCH=yes is unrelated to portmaster. This variable is (should > be) read by port build process it-self as if you build it by command cd > /usr/ports/category/port & make install clean Well, when I install port directly (using `make install` in port's directory) BATCH flag is honored. When I install a port using portmaster it ain't. So, I'm wondering whether it's only me or not. -- Cezary Morga