From owner-freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Sat Jun 18 12:45:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F112A785E6 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 12:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clemens@ladisch.de) Received: from dehamd003.servertools24.de (dehamd003.servertools24.de [31.47.254.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3840D18D0 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 12:45:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clemens@ladisch.de) Received: from [192.168.42.204] (tmo-098-140.customers.d1-online.com [80.187.98.140]) by dehamd003.servertools24.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03177F520034 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:39:23 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: recs for TOSLINK stable/10 PCI audio card To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org References: <72691544-f4a4-71d1-3aa4-88ee187fecbc@pinyon.org> <746bc8fb-eeba-6510-cfb5-4490f6d76b44@pinyon.org> From: Clemens Ladisch Message-ID: <483b32aa-943b-dc2a-8a03-bd39a99edf89@ladisch.de> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:39:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <746bc8fb-eeba-6510-cfb5-4490f6d76b44@pinyon.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PPP-Message-ID: <20160618123924.964886.23176@dehamd003.servertools24.de> X-PPP-Vhost: ladisch.de X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 12:45:08 -0000 Russell L. Carter wrote: > So digging through the offerings on newegg, I am not seeing anything > obvious that provides a TOSLINK connector and is *not* C-Media. Some mainboards have a toslink output. > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/sound/pci/oxygen > > Is a clean room (re)implementation really required to avoid the license > issue? Why, did the author refuse when you asked him? Regards, Clemens