Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:05:26 +0900 From: Yukihiro Nakai <nakai@FreeBSD.org> To: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> Cc: miklic@udlkern.fc.hp.com, nakai@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: GDM Message-ID: <200010170915.SAA27514@ns.tokyo.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20001016164740.A60683@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <39EB060A.B4E87FD5@udlkern.fc.hp.com> <20001016155438.E58406@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <39EB10C2.97F3D78@udlkern.fc.hp.com> <20001016164740.A60683@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Update commited, thanks. On Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:47:40 +0200 Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 08:29:22AM -0600, Andrew M. Miklic wrote: > > This may seem like either a stupid or snotty question, depending on my level > > of ignorance about the ports collection and its ability to change files like > > the /etc/pam.conf, but shouldn't an install of gdm either modify this file > > appropriately so that it will just work "out-of-the-box", or at least do > > something akin to what netscape does (for its java applets problem) and > > print a nice little message at the end of the install notifying the user > > of a potential problem and suggesting a step-by-step manual solution for it? > > Yes, I agree. As you describe, there are a number of ports that do this > already. GDM should be updated to print such a notice too. > > Attached is a quick patch that should update the port; it is however > untested. Basically it displays a copy of pkg-descr (pkg-message). I > have updated some lines however to better reflect reality and to > correct a few spelling mistakes. > > Maintainer, do as you want with this. > > Regards, > > --Stijn > --- Nakai To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010170915.SAA27514>