From owner-freebsd-small Mon Jun 10 14:33:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from zephir.primus.ca (mail.tor.primus.ca [216.254.136.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A2B37B40A; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 14:33:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dialin-133-174.hamilton.primus.ca ([209.90.133.174]) by zephir.primus.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #16) id 17HWmx-0008FK-0A; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 17:33:23 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 17:33:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Jason Hunt X-X-Sender: leth@lethargic.dyndns.org To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: small@FreeBSD.ORG, Communications Machine Subject: Re: Compact Flash vs ATA Disks In-Reply-To: <001401c210a7$f72b2d20$a800000a@transcon> Message-ID: <20020610173028.P89310-100000@lethargic.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Communications Machine wrote: > I need a comparison in terms primarily of performance and reliability > between using compact flash to boot vs a standard ATA disk drive on a > machine used primarily as a router/firewall. > [ ... snip ... ] > Check out http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/solid-state/ Looks pretty interesting to me. You could do the same with a hard-drive that is mounted read-only. The nice part about doing this is that it is stateless, so you don't have to wait for fsck if it crashes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message