Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:08:31 -0800 From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>, FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG>, fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anyone working on fsck? Message-ID: <200303172208.RAA27811@goliath.cnchost.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:56:24 PST." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303171352260.70394-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> You talk like I have a choice :-) > I cannot change ufs/ffs and even if I could the clients wouldn't go for > it. What about changing the size of block size or cyl grp size? Do they change things much? > The problem space is > > Fsck of UFS/FFS partitions is too slow for 200GB+ filesystems. > The solution space can not contain any answer that includes redefining > UFS/FFS. Welcome to the real world. :-) I am so glad I have a separate machine for every few GB of disk space :-) So may be you can have on a multi-processor solution. I'll try to come up with more useful suggestions given your constraints.... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200303172208.RAA27811>