Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 15:00:11 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Yuan, Jue" <yuanjue02@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Enrique Ayesta Perojo <eayesta@portugalete.uned.es> Subject: Re: X.Org 7.0 port? Message-ID: <20060503190011.GB31592@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200605031836.02651.yuanjue@yuanjue.net> References: <200605031811.24564.yuanjue@yuanjue.net> <44588213.3050603@styx.freebsdlover.org> <200605031221.27695.eayesta@portugalete.uned.es> <200605031836.02651.yuanjue@yuanjue.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 06:36:02PM +0800, Yuan, Jue wrote: > On Wednesday 03 May 2006 18:21, you wrote: > > El Mi?rcoles, 3 de Mayo de 2006 12:12, Marco Hafke escribi?: > > > > Since X.Org has released X11R7.0 for quite a long time, why is it s= till > > > > not in the ports tree yet? Are the guys who maintain these ports too > > > > busy these days? ;-) > > > > I think that X11R7.0 is the same release as X11R6.9, except the modular= ity, > > so don't worry, we have the latest sources. Surely the port maintainers > > will be preparing the transition for next releases. >=20 > Got it. Just be curious why it take so long time for porting :-) There is no functional need for a port of Xorg 7.0 since it has no functional differences from 6.9. Kris --TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEWP26Wry0BWjoQKURAiFCAKDjnsiQaS2D62yAISyFi09iNU+ZRgCffOxn M/KVndaCWe6T+2LSyjOH6JE= =ytLU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060503190011.GB31592>