From owner-freebsd-net Mon Mar 29 12:15:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C023E15005 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 12:15:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.9.1/frmug-2.3/nospam) with UUCP id WAA10735 for net@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 22:15:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: by keltia.freenix.fr (Postfix, from userid 101) id B116E87B6; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 21:47:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 21:47:14 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD equiv. of this Linux socket call... Message-ID: <19990329214714.A42277@keltia.freenix.fr> Mail-Followup-To: net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <36FF11E2.4B661EED@cvzoom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <36FF11E2.4B661EED@cvzoom.net>; from Donn Miller on Mon, Mar 29, 1999 at 05:38:42AM +0000 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT/ELF ctm#5173 AMD-K6 MMX @ 200 MHz Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org According to Donn Miller: > this file descriptor to a device interface? What is AF_PACKET; I don't > think FreeBSD supports that either. And we won't. This is an Linux specific evil hack. They don't support bpf so they created a new way (again!) of grabbing packets. Speaking of bpf... NFR has a performance patch for bpf included in the distribution. Has anyone tried to merge our version and their own ? -rw-r----- 1 roberto staff 30444 Dec 9 23:12 bpf.c -rw-r----- 1 roberto staff 7476 Dec 9 23:12 bpf.h -rw-r----- 1 roberto staff 4367 Dec 9 23:12 bpfdesc.h -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #70: Sat Feb 27 09:43:08 CET 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message