From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 22 08:33:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D15106566B; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:33:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nparhar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C2D8FC19; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi9 with SMTP id 9so5946740pwi.13 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:33:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=nKMSTML1t5eo8OczvUZK2CGeTZL1BeEp9yYgOoq0NZk=; b=XvpS9dorTMYODz5MBnYGY4faWjQztEkwGOV+HF86m1R6UD44122yrH3anYItSGJgGc mwzbtX4YrdKnsvTMXJGypqZ8fV4okGKE9qWA5LeuCQ6xTaSJhIMZkaQKuultCUqBqBwE wEjlzR+aDuB7djKzhTWFQrT0qfpPkqLaAYUzw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=UCTblS4Brj/lQvzOYNA7bJF6Ie2OrjLmodVwN7Xhrw73x5R3KljLVMGU+80weMVXHu VeIsn5h+VhCMBXD80Xd0BmtcxdLouMU5VSlvdgnxzYvD2QDVhYaZUGt2Pokl1Z6qiaRG HXYPX1ru0JbQ8l/lzemPKlHaPcMts/CXYXEXE= Received: by 10.140.55.5 with SMTP id d5mr2741918rva.47.1271925208641; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:33:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from itx (c-67-174-240-133.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.174.240.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm1091378pzk.3.2010.04.22.01.33.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:33:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:33:22 -0700 From: Navdeep Parhar To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20100422083322.GA7873@itx> Mail-Followup-To: Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org References: <20100414105819.13143mf12ccgjy4g@webmail.leidinger.net> <20100414132342.74616nl7805cljgo@webmail.leidinger.net> <20100414183540.GA2542@gypsy> <20100416155140.21425jmdvmha7z40@webmail.leidinger.net> <20100422094447.55013b2kkh8ca740@webmail.leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100422094447.55013b2kkh8ca740@webmail.leidinger.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Does "makeoptions WITH_CTF=yes" actually work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:33:29 -0000 On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:44:47AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Navdeep Parhar (from Wed, 21 Apr 2010 > 18:23:33 -0700): > > >Your patch works for me, thanks. There is just one more problem with the CTF > > I found a case where it does not work (not kernel related), I have > another one which works better. > > >generation that needs to be fixed: > > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2009-April/028244.html > > > >While you're here can you take a look at the patch in that email too? > > Looks good in concept, but the CTFMERGE line needs the same > treatment like all the other ones in the .mk files. I want to commit > a suitable change today. Does "same treatment" mean it should run silently too? My personal opinion is that all ctfconvert and ctfmerge commands should show up in the output of make iff they run. I believe that used to be the case before r206082. Regards, Navdeep