Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:08:46 +0000 From: "Alexandre Vieira" <nullpt@gmail.com> To: "Miles Nordin" <carton@ivy.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netra T1 105 (sparc64) optimization Message-ID: <755cb9fc0611301208w1ff93987m88885b3b59444373@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <oqzma869j9.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET> References: <755cb9fc0611290724q127f006va84f3457c48443b6@mail.gmail.com> <oq8xht7biy.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET> <456E8D8B.8010102@orel.ru> <755cb9fc0611300454s4d28ad14rd402cba8388d49@mail.gmail.com> <14989d6e0611300700n3ac073bayc4584f2b1020ee61@mail.gmail.com> <755cb9fc0611300839y6deed1ceqf452018cc2f73737@mail.gmail.com> <oqzma869j9.fsf@castrovalva.Ivy.NET>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/30/06, Miles Nordin <carton@ivy.net> wrote: > > >>>>> "av" == Alexandre Vieira <nullpt@gmail.com> writes: > > av> polling increased dramaticly the latency for all traffic that > av> passes trough the bridge and reduced the transmission rate > av> also. > > That's interesting. What do you mean by transmission rate? Are you > seeing dropped packets? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > No, it just doesn't transfer as many as it does without polling. Without polling it transfers like 8MB/s, with polling it does less than this and there is twice the latency. -- Alexandre Vieira - nullpt@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?755cb9fc0611301208w1ff93987m88885b3b59444373>