From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 9 18:34:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA03206 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 18:34:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA03201 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 18:34:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA19685; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 18:34:49 -0700 (PDT) To: dennis cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2.1R NFS and FTP load problem UPDATE In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 Apr 1997 19:28:25 EDT." <3.0.32.19970409192821.00af15a0@etinc.com> Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 18:34:49 -0700 Message-ID: <19681.860636089@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I notice that when I select kernel developer, it also automagically > selects user. This never happened in previous releases. Is this > supposed to happen? Could there be a problem with an allocation > somewhere? It's just a change in the way the flags are displayed. It now shows all "qualifying" sets which are selected, some of which are supersets of others. I had to do it this way because of the way you're now allowed to go back in and select individual dists via custom to augment the "canned" sets. I wanted to show whenever you had *everything* in a canned set selected, regardless of whether other larger sets matched the same criteria. Potentially confusing, yes, but at least it makes sense. The previous scheme was confusing and occasionally made no sense at all (it was easy to get it confused about what "set" was really selected and get totally erroneous display output). Jordan