Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Nov 2018 08:02:53 -0500
From:      George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 13-CURRENT: several GB swap being used despite plenty of free RAM
Message-ID:  <0fd769af-9a7d-95cf-7cba-5e41e3bc3c30@m5p.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACc-My33oRg7eqjfDuEQU51inyydc66Hx%2B-DysqmdKyyMVVJsA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> <F5ACF6D0-DBD7-416F-9AAC-7709771FE545@yahoo.com> <201811180154.wAI1smhg049214@slippy.cwsent.com> <CACc-My33oRg7eqjfDuEQU51inyydc66Hx%2B-DysqmdKyyMVVJsA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--XVc9df5vdVSPHE3rcRFs2LyhdBuvqkizr
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="rJOsc9QsAnfUOkqf21F8wVTeJwhF6WhiX";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <0fd769af-9a7d-95cf-7cba-5e41e3bc3c30@m5p.com>
Subject: Re: 13-CURRENT: several GB swap being used despite plenty of free RAM
References: <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
 <F5ACF6D0-DBD7-416F-9AAC-7709771FE545@yahoo.com>
 <201811180154.wAI1smhg049214@slippy.cwsent.com>
 <CACc-My33oRg7eqjfDuEQU51inyydc66Hx+-DysqmdKyyMVVJsA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACc-My33oRg7eqjfDuEQU51inyydc66Hx+-DysqmdKyyMVVJsA@mail.gmail.com>

--rJOsc9QsAnfUOkqf21F8wVTeJwhF6WhiX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 11/18/18 7:11 AM, Stefan Blachmann wrote:
> The inconveniences that the new swapping strategy causes are a regular
> topic in the FreeBSD forums.
>=20
> Desktop users complain about lagginess, server users complain of long
> delays because server processes intended to be kept in memory for
> quick response times got swapped out and need to be swapped in again,
> resulting in outrageously poor server performance in spite of plenty
> of unused memory.  [...]
Before necessarily blaming swapping, have you tried substituting
SCHED_4BSD for SCHED_ULE in the kernel?  SCHED_ULE is not the world
champion scheduler for interactive tasks.

(I'm ducking back into my rabbit hole now and no one needs to throw
any more brickbats at me.  Sorry for the digression.)      -- George


--rJOsc9QsAnfUOkqf21F8wVTeJwhF6WhiX--

--XVc9df5vdVSPHE3rcRFs2LyhdBuvqkizr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=/ywx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--XVc9df5vdVSPHE3rcRFs2LyhdBuvqkizr--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0fd769af-9a7d-95cf-7cba-5e41e3bc3c30>