From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 21 17:26:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17E5AAA3 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3A1B13E3 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C2215B94C; Tue, 21 Jan 2014 12:26:46 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Atom Board ACPI API MOPNV10J failing since 9.1 Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:58:37 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20130906; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <52CF850A.9060906@erdgeist.org> <52D61BFA.1070205@erdgeist.org> In-Reply-To: <52D61BFA.1070205@erdgeist.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201401211158.37784.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 21 Jan 2014 12:26:46 -0500 (EST) Cc: Dirk Engling , David Shane Holden X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:26:48 -0000 On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 12:26:18 am Dirk Engling wrote: > On 15.01.14 05:02, David Shane Holden wrote: > > > I'm all for chalking this up to a subpar BIOS that ships with this > > board, but if it might be a problem in FreeBSD that could rear its ugly > > head somewhere else I'd like to help track down what's causing it. I'll > > try to find some time to test a Debian live CD and see how Linux handles > > it tomorrow. > > Look no further than FreeBSD pre 9.1, where my system worked flawlessly > for several years despite the on board audio and ACHI settings. It would > be interesting to see what has changed between 9.0 and 9.1. One of the changes is that for ACPI devices we always reserve the resources they claim even if the driver only asks for a subset (previously we only claimed what the driver explicitly asked for). This is important for making sure we don't hand a resource out to another device that is actually in use by an ACPI device (just not by the current driver). -- John Baldwin