From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Mar 26 05:05:41 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA16403 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 05:05:41 -0800
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id FAA16396 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 05:05:35 -0800
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA12753
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Sun, 26 Mar 1995 06:49:22 -0600
Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA17179; 26 Mar 95 06:48:37 CST (Sun)
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id GAA17176; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 06:48:36 -0600
From: Peter da Silva <peter@bonkers.taronga.com>
Message-Id: <199503261248.GAA17176@bonkers.taronga.com>
Subject: Re: CERN and NCSA httpd...
To: paul@isl.cf.ac.uk (Paul Richards)
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 1995 06:48:36 -0600 (CST)
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199503260728.IAA02722@isl.cf.ac.uk> from "Paul Richards" at Mar 26, 95 07:28:33 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 314       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > Perhaps the CERN daemon has better locality? What's NCSA holding on in it's
> > megabyte-odd of BSS, too?

> Hmm I wonder if cern malloc's more of it's data area.

I would expect it does.

It's still using up a lot less real memory, regardless, which is interesting
considering it's got a bigger text segment.