From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jul 23 21:30:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA10163 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 23 Jul 1998 21:30:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA10057 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 1998 21:29:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA02539; Thu, 23 Jul 1998 21:28:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Tom cc: Doug White , Lee Reese , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Viability of -current for Usenet News In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Jul 1998 21:27:19 PDT." Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 21:28:35 -0700 Message-ID: <2536.901254515@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Documented? Announced? Gee, I'm on freebsd-stable, freebsd-scsi, and > freebsd-scsi and I never saw any "the sysinstall bug that makes installing > on DPT arrays is fixed" message. I'm talking of another set of bugs. I'm on -stable and -scsi too (though I'm only on -scsi once :) and I never saw any "sysinstall is broken on DPT arrays" message either, so there's nothing to refute. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message