From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 02:10:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B08316A4CE; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 02:10:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB6443D55; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 02:09:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id C1D93530A; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:09:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id C04495308; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:09:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 50DDB33C9A; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:09:49 +0100 (CET) To: Mark Murray References: <3FFC03E5.7010305@iconoplex.co.uk> <200401071429.i07ETZMI068819@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20040107200838.GD86935@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 11:09:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20040107200838.GD86935@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> (Roman Neuhauser's message of "Wed, 7 Jan 2004 21:08:38 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 10:10:09 -0000 Roman Neuhauser writes: > The ports freeze seems to last too long with recent releses. Or > maybe it's just I've gotten more involved, but out of the last four > months (2003/09/07-today), ports tree has been completely open > for whopping 28 days. I strongly suspect that this could be at least partially alleviated by giving portmgr more package-building hardware to play with. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no