Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 17:39:26 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Cc: Erich <erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Adam Strohl <adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com> Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20120605153926.GJ71005@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <4FCBCF49.1010206@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <C480320C-0CD9-4B61-8AFB-37085C820AB7@FreeBSD.org> <2421561.4aJcXPZZxh@x220.ovitrap.com> <4FCB38F2.4030505@ateamsystems.com> <3851080.JQJobqxLc8@x220.ovitrap.com> <4FCBCF49.1010206@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--1y6imfT/xHuCvpN0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Look at the comment of the maintainer of LibreOffice ... btw I tested and libreoffice is still working as expected. Most of the time the libreoffice failures is from people tuning their system without knowing the impact/risk of doing such, for example building some c++ libraries with g++47 let's imagine cppunit or anyother library depended on by libreoffice, and building libreoffice with clang (which is default) and using the libstdc++ from base (which also is default) and the mix of libstdc++ is producing tons of problems. problem i can't fix. regards, Bapt --1y6imfT/xHuCvpN0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/OKC4ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EztwgCgldutb69mAaK0/GxSoXYnBBcB 5s4AoJi8EpcDromNF8pEvEJMA+cDFWef =yreM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1y6imfT/xHuCvpN0--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120605153926.GJ71005>