Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 13:25:12 +0200 From: Daniel Hartmeier <daniel@benzedrine.cx> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel ignores default route? Message-ID: <20120711112512.GF9145@insomnia.benzedrine.cx> In-Reply-To: <20120711043110.GR42080@manor.msen.com> References: <20120711043110.GR42080@manor.msen.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:31:11AM -0400, Michael R. Wayne wrote: > I have two routers, on the same ethernet at: > 148.59.4.1 (default) > 148.59.4.3 & 139.171.192.26 > 148.59.4.2 (FreeBSD box) > 148.59.4.0/27 link#2 UC 0 0 fxp0 > 148.59.4.1 00:a0:c8:2c:5f:38 UHLW 2 602 fxp0 47 > 148.59.4.3 00:a0:c8:2c:5f:38 UHLW 5 0 fxp0 23 Which router has MAC 00:a0:c8:2c:5f:38 (00:a0:c8 is Adtrans Inc.)? Is arp -na showing the same MAC for both routers, even though their all in the same segment? Your routing table can distinguish between next-hops .1 and .3 all you want, if ARP for both goes to the same MAC... Daniel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120711112512.GF9145>