Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:36:27 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com>, Don Lewis <truckman@freebsd.org>, mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency Message-ID: <20161027183627.GA35998@over-yonder.net> In-Reply-To: <d03b2791-0114-35d4-c821-ba7c7db616de@FreeBSD.org> References: <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <ded708c9-f2bf-6b2f-84cf-f97f91c39888@FreeBSD.org> <CAO%2BPfDdXbbgVMZnxiJig%2B_drLNYRftD4ruqXxHpybztiR1eBAA@mail.gmail.com> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> <CAO%2BPfDdJ7wv-rzrX7bTRhfY1W_qcL3%2BgZthqy-aq0sqYhDVcgg@mail.gmail.com> <bd8cf64a-7c04-d58b-b9ab-1abbb4cc062b@FreeBSD.org> <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> <d03b2791-0114-35d4-c821-ba7c7db616de@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:35:25PM +0200 I heard the voice of Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus: > > Well, that is another problem, and you are right, OpenSSL's shlib > should have been bumped, blame the former maintainer for that. I'll > talk to the new maintainer about that. The argument could be made that (a) OpenSSL 1.1.0 is gonna be released and brought into ports Any Day Now and it already has a different shlibver (and that would get us back on parity with upstream, for what that's worth), and (b) by the time 11-CURRENT (where you gotta expect bumps) becomes 11-STABLE, base openssl will be private-ized anyway. It's a good couple theories... -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161027183627.GA35998>