Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Oct 2016 13:36:27 -0500
From:      "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>
To:        Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com>, Don Lewis <truckman@freebsd.org>, mad@madpilot.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency
Message-ID:  <20161027183627.GA35998@over-yonder.net>
In-Reply-To: <d03b2791-0114-35d4-c821-ba7c7db616de@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201610252214.u9PME6br070248@gw.catspoiler.org> <ded708c9-f2bf-6b2f-84cf-f97f91c39888@FreeBSD.org> <CAO%2BPfDdXbbgVMZnxiJig%2B_drLNYRftD4ruqXxHpybztiR1eBAA@mail.gmail.com> <7fb24c94-1efa-d1b5-9028-8dec8330e543@FreeBSD.org> <CAO%2BPfDdJ7wv-rzrX7bTRhfY1W_qcL3%2BgZthqy-aq0sqYhDVcgg@mail.gmail.com> <bd8cf64a-7c04-d58b-b9ab-1abbb4cc062b@FreeBSD.org> <20161027150035.GP79735@over-yonder.net> <d03b2791-0114-35d4-c821-ba7c7db616de@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:35:25PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus:
> 
> Well, that is another problem, and you are right, OpenSSL's shlib
> should have been bumped, blame the former maintainer for that. I'll
> talk to the new maintainer about that.

The argument could be made that (a) OpenSSL 1.1.0 is gonna be released
and brought into ports Any Day Now and it already has a different
shlibver (and that would get us back on parity with upstream, for what
that's worth), and (b) by the time 11-CURRENT (where you gotta expect
bumps) becomes 11-STABLE, base openssl will be private-ized anyway.

It's a good couple theories...


-- 
Matthew Fuller     (MF4839)   |  fullermd@over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/
           On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161027183627.GA35998>