From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Aug 19  6:45:23 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com (cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com [24.3.25.17])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1C65A14EAF; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 06:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sjr@home.net)
Received: (from sjr@localhost)
	by cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA02798;
	Thu, 19 Aug 1999 09:44:50 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from sjr)
Message-Id: <199908191344.JAA02798@cc158233-a.catv1.md.home.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 09:44:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Stephen J. Roznowski" <sjr@home.net>
Subject: Re: Should initial package creation make /usr/ports/packages?
To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: sjr@home.net, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <19990818121444.A95122@dragon.nuxi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On 18 Aug, David O'Brien wrote:
>> No, it will create a package in the current directory if
>> /usr/ports/packages doesn't exist.
>> 
>> No, I don't partularly like this behavior, but it's been that way for
>> years.
> 
> And others of us would scream like hell if it was changed.  ;-)

Just curious, but why is that?

-SR



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message