From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 19:34:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684E716A4DA for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17CA43D45 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:34:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1659708wxd for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.90.18 with SMTP id n18mr10166882wxb; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ( [67.189.184.224]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id h9sm4916627wxd.2006.08.21.12.34.08; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:34:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885B5C3BC for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:29:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B65C2B9 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:29:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by scorpio.seibercom.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k7LJT4oH003513 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:29:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) From: Gerard Seibert Organization: Seibercom.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:28:53 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <200608211444.50152.gerard@seibercom.net> <44EA0352.7020206@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <44EA0352.7020206@u.washington.edu> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(=?utf-8?q?gxJxxc=0A=09RnSNPNr*/=5E=7EStawWU9KDJ-CT0k=24f=23?=@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1557305.LkL1oDpb5I"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608211529.03858.gerard@seibercom.net> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: [OT] CVSUP (was "Re: Was: Re: Why This Infinite Loop??") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gerard@seibercom.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:34:10 -0000 --nextPart1557305.LkL1oDpb5I Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 21 August 2006 15:02, Garrett Cooper wrote: > =A0 =A0 CVSUP isn't that difficult IMHO to learn, and is a better, more > efficient way to download the ports Makefiles. It will take him all of > 10-20 minutes to configure if he reads the documentation and uses the > example file. I am always willing to learn something new. How is it more efficient at=20 downloading the port's Makefiles? I agree that the first time you=20 run 'portsnap' it might take twenty minutes to fetch and extract the files.= =20 However, after that it only requires a fetch and update to complete the job= =2E=20 It appears, to me anyway, to run at least as quick as cvsup plus I do not=20 have to rebuild the index. If he runs cvsup I believe he has to rebuild the= =20 index, or am I mistaken? In any case, he has to use one method or the other or he will never get his= =20 system updated. =2D-=20 Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net Every man takes the limits of his own field of vision for the limits of the world. Schopenhauer --nextPart1557305.LkL1oDpb5I Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBE6gl/s3R1WQUU6lgRAvWWAJ9R6CBeTlA3MDN3fUNcBbs4bzmnbACdF+PH 7BlTA63L69YpfpcJiGyraP0= =qQ/Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1557305.LkL1oDpb5I--