From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 11 07:24:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301F11065674 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:24:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (lev.vlakno.cz [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FA68FC08 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA9A9CB0AE; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:20:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VDds1Vfx-7c6; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:20:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F30E9CB111; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:20:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o5B7Koar064387; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:20:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:20:50 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: Matthew Jacob Message-ID: <20100611072050.GA64034@freebsd.org> References: <4C113167.8040205@feral.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C113167.8040205@feral.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel make noise with clang suppression X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:24:40 -0000 On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:39:35AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote: > Comments? (yes, I know -fformat-extensions have just been added...) yes, clang reports A LOT MORE warnings than gcc but I believe that we should not supress those atm. I'd prefer people to take a look at those and fix them instead. clang in clangbsd is complaining much less btw. (it does not complain about unknown params etc.) note that we are still in the progress of importing stuff from clangbsd and it takes time. please be patient :)