From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 19 00:35:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1C416A4CE; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:35:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [193.162.142.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A580043D3F; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:35:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 048012282C; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:35:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:35:55 +0100 From: Erwin Lansing To: ports@FreeBSD.org, perl@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20031219083555.GB87519@droso.net> Mail-Followup-To: ports@FreeBSD.org, perl@FreeBSD.org References: <200312190805.hBJ85pPL021711@repoman.freebsd.org> <63476156.1071825145@sauron.in.mat.cc> <20031219081604.GH90871@voodoo.oberon.net> <3FE2B724.9060902@lonesome.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FE2B724.9060902@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 5.1-CURRENT Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 08:35:59 -0000 --tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 02:30:28AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > > > > > >Maybe it's better to move all p5-* ports which are maintained > >by ports@FreeBSD.org to perl@FreeBSD.org ? > >=20 > > > Please don't do this. In addition to the repo churn, there are many plac= es > in the FreeBSD documentation that state that "ports@" is the canonical > stand-in value for "unmaintained". This would violate POLA IMHO. I must agree. The other projects, like kde@ and gnome@, have ports assigned to them because they do maintain them, not unmaintained ports that are kde or gnome related. I don't think perl@ has the intention to take over _all_ unmaintained perl related ports :) --=20 _._ _,-'""`-._ Erwin Lansing (,-.`._,'( |\`-/| erwin@lansing.dk http://droso.org `-.-' \ )-`( , o o) erwin@FreeBSD.org -bf- `- \`_`"'- --tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/4rhrqy9aWxUlaZARArzEAJ9yaaZduZFpzzqTxSWhotzUkOrv1QCfS665 7ab7GX893KRw7yEHf+mWMtA= =ERvL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye--