From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 23:55:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 408ED295 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 23:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E94445F7 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 23:55:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9ANtYLl046045 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:55:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s9ANtYBZ046042; Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:55:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:55:34 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: sh man page .... In-Reply-To: <5437FE3D.8070808@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: References: <5437FB8B.9080008@hiwaay.net> <5437FE3D.8070808@hiwaay.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:55:34 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 23:55:36 -0000 On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > Well !!!! The sh man page is mute on the fact that an empty string is an > error in arithmetic or logical evaluations, which is an omission irrespective > of what bash does :-). I presume that converting Linux users to FBSD users is > an agenda item here (maybe my error), thus suitably complete man pages should > be an important goal, I would think. I didn't think converting from Linux to > FBSD was/is a bad habit ;-) .... If there are things missing from sh(1), please enter a bug report. I can't guarantee whether it will be worked on soon, but it will be there and waiting.