From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 22 10:46:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: multimedia@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C935FE05 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFA6D68 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:46:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAMAk5jj012567 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:46:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: multimedia@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194399] [patch] comms/spandsp: update to 0.0.6 Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:46:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: madpilot@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pawel@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 10:46:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194399 --- Comment #6 from Guido Falsi --- (In reply to Pawel Pekala from comment #4) > Hello maintainers of ports affected by comms/spandsp update > > Please test attached patch for any runtime problems. I've build > tested it and it seems build fine all of the affected ports. Hi, I've performed some testing with asterisk and it does not cause problems. So you have my approval for this. Thanks! > Note that I skipped UPDATING part which will be needed to help > users to upgrade. If no one objects I plan to commit in 2 weeks > from today. > Next step will be deprecation of comms/spandsp-devel which will > be older than this port version wise. > > Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.