From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 11 10:09:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0EBD0F for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 10:09:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com (mail-lb0-f182.google.com [209.85.217.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E077D8FC14 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 10:09:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id gg13so371475lbb.13 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 02:09:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wemm.org; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=b52Xg+7pLkc9ECsBIwNQmR/zNcXqgbh+I3SXYgupD2I=; b=wmSdeeQEpqHomOS5QPabwzy/CUElf7aA7OJvVWSCYwrpBaf27oibL6wqeTNfdms+mH IPGoRsl1dQh18W5P0+CF6oznSk6mgUJ524XxN57CACeNbI4CN4Ta3G5eJnFsn4ajMQWg ADkummmI7mZ86mwQfxRhQiD8R/kPRum2eEkQA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=b52Xg+7pLkc9ECsBIwNQmR/zNcXqgbh+I3SXYgupD2I=; b=ai7wA5aZNPgpLmPDj/m8Rkx27KQoVBZXqANrJ5wq5/L4SRxPkx/94e1K76PwrDRIaq bCG7aO8Sshz+wkVtYLfElqmgnUpzdD5rzn2D9rNCx9fJPBPuedZWJcs5VoUnLTs8dHdu dvVM1SoqvXmiNwBIB4PaQsZKuFqagQtSBe9hBqJSD4jzz8MbdgE6S3wgkXRO92GbRntC ofYb4HHf4VGXfOIbiM4BSiGoftaX078KbkjLzpyhbqhvs75wdweU/4C86UAJjFwGrAQh w3KaECoPr1+JERHIfO7ojlEF1FHu++ie41eEypfo3CpUPhNJfadlnsjZbXrIPjDsT0UB LCJQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.106.79 with SMTP id gs15mr15293865lab.31.1352628582723; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 02:09:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.7.41 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 02:09:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <509F72B0.90201@mu.org> References: <509DC25E.5030306@mu.org> <509E3162.5020702@FreeBSD.org> <509E7E7C.9000104@mu.org> <509E830D.5080006@mu.org> <1352568275.17290.85.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <20121111061517.H1208@besplex.bde.org> <20121111073352.GA96046@FreeBSD.org> <509F72B0.90201@mu.org> Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 02:09:42 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r242847 - in head/sys: i386/include kern From: Peter Wemm To: Alfred Perlstein Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlDyPI8V6UPHi2QV3BCVlgJfvw5ORbZvdkxYCHIRQQ68+JZpoPIIRh0OJ43jDBx17z3QBNZ Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 10:09:44 -0000 On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > On 11/10/12 11:33 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >> >> On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:22:52PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: >>> >>> We've had kern.ipc.nmbclusters for years. It is simple to understand, >>> easy to predict the outcome of a change, is runtime adjustable, is a >>> *cap* and not a reservation (like it used to be) and does not require >>> a reboot like maxusers tweaking would, and doesn't change maxproc as a >>> side effect. >>> >>> Tune the caps sensibly by default and move on. maxusers must die. >> >> Big +1. I would also like to get rid of maxusers altogether. >> >> ./danfe > > You aren't really understanding it. > > The contrived examples Peter are giving are *wrong*. What are the correct numbers then? -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; KI6FJV "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 "If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution." -- Robert Sewell